Skip to content
DeshLoopDeshLoopSearch DeshLoop
Evidence & answers
Skip to the case content
DeshLoopDeshLoopThakurgaon

PUBLIC MONEY · QUESTIONS WITH EVIDENCE

Follow the evidence, question by question

Three bounded Thakurgaon cases connect official claims, explainable checks, missing records and review history.

Reviewed: · 3 selected cases

1

What the source says

Read the specific claim and its source page.

2

What the check establishes

See the rule, its inputs and what cannot yet be determined.

3

What would answer it

Find the missing record, its holder and the next evidence.

Download reviewed case data

3 cases shown

Question unresolvedPirganj Upazila Parishad pond; exact installation positions not established.

Pirganj pond lighting

What was approved, installed and paid for the reported Tk 499,400 pond-lighting work?

The ADP row reports Tk 499,400 expenditure and 100% progress. Item quantities, exact procurement identity, acceptance and executed payment remain unverified.

ScopeOne scheme in Pirganj Upazila Parishad’s FY 2024–25 ADP report; not its whole ADP account or district spending.
  • Some checks need additional evidence
Question unresolvedThakurgaon Sadar; identified road segment.

Danarhat–Balapara road

Why does one source row show 0% physical progress and “Final Bill”?

LGED prints 0% physical progress alongside Final Bill. The meaning of these fields, accepted work and executed payment need explanation from the underlying records.

ScopeTender 634018; package RDRIIP-2/W-VRA-290; road 194944134; chainage 0–1000 m.
  • Source fields need explanation
  • Some checks need additional evidence
Question unresolvedThakurgaon Sadar Upazila Parishad revenue account.

Sadar account-year conflict

Which financial year do these repeated account figures describe?

Three totals repeat under different year labels. Correct period attribution and a corrected/certified account are needed before financial reconciliation.

ScopeSelected FormA revenue figures in documents labelled FY 2024–25 and FY 2020–21. No current-year spending attribution is admitted.
  • Source fields need explanation
  • Some checks need additional evidence

What this collection covers

  • These are reviewed source questions, not corruption verdicts or a complete district account.
  • No request is submitted automatically. No official reply, citizen observation or field inspection is invented.
Find a work or service