Thakurgaon
Construction of Rigid Pavement Works at 5th(p) Km, 6th(p) Km, 16th(p) Km & 17th(p) Km of…
Only the selected work or record.
Thakurgaon–Ruhia road · Selected contract only
Where the money is
Each step is a separate stage; amounts are never added together.
Estimate or approved cost
Record not obtainedFunds released
This record does not cover this stage
Contract
This record does not cover this stage
Spending in a report
This record does not cover this stage
Certified bill
This record does not cover this stage
Payment made
This record does not cover this stage
Cost by part
The list of what each part of this work costs (an estimate or BOQ) has not been obtained. It cannot be worked out from the contract total.
What happened when
Notice published
Source reportBidding closes
PlannedToday
A date in a report or certificate is not an inspection.
Who answers for it
What you can do
For safety, keep faces, house numbers and phone numbers out of photos and posts.
Full account and evidence
Every figure, date and document with its source. Open a topic to check it.
Every amount and its source
No sourced amount
Separate financial stages · never added together
No sourced amount is established for this record.
Not collectedAllocationFunds releasedCertified billsExecuted payments
- Allocation Document fees and bid security are not project budgets.
- Funds released The required evidence has not been collected. Unknown does not mean zero.
- Certified bills The required evidence has not been collected. Unknown does not mean zero.
- Executed payments The required evidence has not been collected. Unknown does not mean zero.
Payment ledger incompleteCash balance unknown
Unknown payments are not zero. Differences between financial stages do not establish unspent or missing money. A comparable ledger and reconciliation are needed for a balance.
Dates in the records
2 dated entries
Notice published Source reported
A dated source report, not an independent inspection, acceptance or executed-payment record.Bidding closes Planned
A planned date, not proof the event occurred.
A completed date field or certificate claim does not establish independent acceptance. An actual start or completion date is only identified when the source establishes it.
Work reports
No dated report
A contract amount alone does not show how much work was delivered.
Independent acceptance and the present condition are not established here. A dated resident observation appears in the conversation as a citizen account.
Scope & responsibility
A specific work package
Only this record’s scope. Related plans, contracts and programme budgets cannot be added together. The source declares the location; current delivery is not independently verified.
- Responsible office in source
- Roads & Highways Department (RHD)
- Record
- tender-1319272
Location is recorded in the source; current conditions have not been independently inspected.
Original record title
Construction of Rigid Pavement Works at 5th(p) Km, 6th(p) Km, 16th(p) Km & 17th(p) Km of Thakurgaon-Ruhia (Z-5059) Road under Road Division, Thakurgaon during the year 2026-2027.
Record details
Identifiers, procurement and bids
Planned quantities are separate from measured or accepted work.
Record and package identifiers
- Tender ID
- 1319272
- Package
- 02/e-GP/OTM/PMP-Major Roads/EE/TRD/2026-2027 Construction of Rigid Pavement Works at 5th(p) Km, 6th(p) Km, 16th(p) Km & 17th(p) Km of Thakurgaon-Ruhia (Z-5059) Road under Road Division, Thakurgaon during the year 2026-2027.
- Project code
- Not applicable
- Project
- Not applicable
- APP ID
- 230047
- Procuring entity name as printed
- Thakurgaon Road Division
Funding and procurement
- Procurement method
- Open Tendering Method (OTM)
- Funding
- Government
- Held listing status
- observed_live
Work, quantity and source details
- Procuring entity district as printed
- Dinajpur
- Source-declared work location
- Thakurgaon-Ruhia road (Z-5059), portions of km 5, 6, 16 and 17; declared in the work description
- Geographic qualification
- Work description declares Thakurgaon; PE district metadata says Dinajpur. No ward point or beneficiary area is inferred.
Retain the record’s geographic qualification: office association or a mention does not establish local delivery.
Differences & limits
2 points to check
These are questions to check. Missing records, money differences and reported completion do not establish corruption.
- A listing status does not establish the construction stage.
- Geographic source conflict: work description names Thakurgaon-Ruhia while procuring-entity district says Dinajpur. Both assertions remain; the location qualification is description-based.
Missing documents
5 records · who holds them
The work’s current stage and document availability have not yet been reviewed. A plan or tender record does not establish that work took place or that a final bill is due. The records below still need checks for applicability and a collection route.
Office holding all of these: Roads & Highways Department (RHD)
Approved scope and item prices
Availability not reviewedA title and total price do not establish quantities, specifications or unit rates.
Work order, start and approved changes
Availability not reviewedSigning, planned dates and source-reported dates have different meanings.
Measurements and acceptance
Availability not reviewedA progress percentage or completion claim is not itemized accepted work.
Certified bills and deductions
Availability not reviewedA Final Bill remark does not supply the signed bill, retention, tax or adjustments.
Executed payments and reconciliation
Availability not reviewedReported expenditure does not identify every executed transaction or a current balance.
Keep a private follow-up
Your own notes on requests and replies
Original documents · open a page to check the claim
…