কাজের হিসাব খুলছে…
Skip to content
Work account
Thakurgaon Sadar
Thakurgaon engineering college: building, time and inspection
The Thakurgaon college component only.
The evidenced situation
Administrative-building contract value in report: ৳163,165,900 · Date not known
50% · June 2026
Payment and present condition remain separate questions.
Thakurgaon engineering college: building, time and inspection · Questions, observations & replies
Loading source developments…
Loading conversations…
Administrative-building contract value in report৳16.32 croreDate not known · Report table 3.6, Thakurgaon W-08
PaidUnknownBills and payments not obtained
Work50%June 2026 · source saysAcceptance and today's condition unverified
RecordUnion parishad workFrom the union parishad website
Where the money is
Each step is a separate stage; amounts are never added together.
Estimate or approved cost
৳18.13 croreAdministrative-building estimate in report · ৳181,308,000 · Date not known · Report table 3.6, Thakurgaon W-08What this figure is
A source-reported amount, not independently verified executed payments. Do not add cumulative and annual figures, or components and their totals.
Funds released
Record not obtained · unknown is not zero
Contract
৳16.32 croreAdministrative-building contract value in report · ৳163,165,900 · Date not known · Report table 3.6, Thakurgaon W-08What this figure is
As printed: 1,631.659 lakh = BDT 163,165,900. This differs from the candidate e-GP award BDT 163,177,531.659. No variation or payment inferred.
Spending in a report
Record not obtainedCertified bill
Record not obtained · unknown is not zero
Payment made
Record not obtained · unknown is not zero
One component only · not a breakdown of this work
Spending as the source reports it · not proof of paymentThe Thakurgaon college component only.
Thakurgaon land acquisition — reported component৳5.88 crore
- Exact amount
- ৳58,837,000
- Stage
- Reported spending
- Date
- Not stated in the source
Reported Thakurgaon land-acquisition amount, separate from the administrative-building contract. The table says paid, but no payee-level compensation ledger, voucher or executed settlement reference is held. It is not the building expenditure headline.
What these amounts are
Each row is as the source gives it. Rows are not added into a total.
What happened when
Land-acquisition letter to Deputy Commissioner
Source reportReported land handover to EED
Source reportSource schedule start — disputed
Source reportIMED-reported field inspection
Source reportDate under completion heading — unverified
Source reportSource schedule finish — disputed
Source reportToday
A date in a report or certificate is not an inspection.
Who answers for it
Responsible officeDirectorate of Technical EducationHow to request information
What you can do
Keep trackHear when records, questions or replies change.
For safety, keep faces, house numbers and phone numbers out of photos and posts.
Full account and evidence
Every figure, date and document with its source. Open a topic to check it.
Every amount and its source
2 sourced amounts · 3 stages not collected
Separate financial stages · never added together
- Administrative-building contract value in report৳163,165,900Reporting date unknown · Report table 3.6, Thakurgaon W-08
As printed: 1,631.659 lakh = BDT 163,165,900. This differs from the candidate e-GP award BDT 163,177,531.659. No variation or payment inferred.
- Administrative-building estimate in report৳181,308,000Reporting date unknown · Report table 3.6, Thakurgaon W-08
A source-reported amount, not independently verified executed payments. Do not add cumulative and annual figures, or components and their totals.
Not collectedFunds releasedCertified billsExecuted payments
The required evidence has not been collected. Unknown does not mean zero.
- Funds released
- Certified bills
- Executed payments
Payment ledger incompleteCash balance unknown
Unknown payments are not zero. Differences between financial stages do not establish unspent or missing money. A comparable ledger and reconciliation are needed for a balance.
Dates in the records
6 dated entries
Land-acquisition letter to Deputy Commissioner Source reported
The date is reported in IMED table 3.4. The original letter/handover instrument is not held; it concerns land, not building commencement or acceptance.Reported land handover to EED Source reported
The date is reported in IMED table 3.4. The original letter/handover instrument is not held; it concerns land, not building commencement or acceptance.Source schedule start — disputed Source reported
Disputed source date only. IMED dates conflict internally and with the candidate award; 50% progress and ongoing works prevent treating the completion heading as actual completion. Do not calculate an established delay from these fields.Date under completion heading — unverified Source reported
Disputed source date only. IMED dates conflict internally and with the candidate award; 50% progress and ongoing works prevent treating the completion heading as actual completion. Do not calculate an established delay from these fields.Source schedule finish — disputed Source reported
Disputed source date only. IMED dates conflict internally and with the candidate award; 50% progress and ongoing works prevent treating the completion heading as actual completion. Do not calculate an established delay from these fields.
A completed date field or certificate claim does not establish independent acceptance. An actual start or completion date is only identified when the source establishes it.
Work reports
50% · acceptance unverified
- Reported building progress50%
2026-06 · June 2026 report: fifth-floor roof cast and sixth-floor works ongoing. The report includes April 2026 inspection evidence; this does not establish today’s status.
- Building scope and area in reportTen-storey administrative building on ten-storey foundation; table quantity 5,090 square metres
2026-06 · A report description, not a priced BOQ or accepted measurement book.
- Dated site concernsHoneycombing in columns/beams; stock register, approved workplan and periodic progress reports were not found by reviewers.
2026-06 · IMED report’s observations at that review. They do not establish current unresolved defects or corruption. Obtain correction and follow-up records.
- Reported sampled concrete testsSix rebound-test rows dated 12 April 2026; the report marks the desired result obtained in all six.
12 April 2026 · Keep this positive result alongside defects. It is a report of limited sampled rebound tests, not a structural safety certification or acceptance of every item.
- Acquired land described by IMED8.00 acres; land development not started in the report.
2026-06 · Dated report statement for the land component. The land-case number, parcel schedule, original handover and current development status are not established here.
- Administrative-building procurement planWorks package 8: 5090 square metres; OTM; planned signing 16 October 2023; duration 30 months; estimate 1876.55 lakh.
2026-06 · Appendix planning fields, not the signed contract, measured area or actual dates. The procurement table elsewhere prints estimate 1813.08 lakh; the version difference needs approval records and is not evidence of an authorized variation.
- Held BUET laboratory reportSteel bars tested 4 April 2024; signed report 5 April; BRTC 1103-18730/CE23-24. The report names the ten-storey Thakurgaon administrative building and sealed samples.
4 April 2024 · A laboratory report retained inside IMED, not online authentication by BUET. Results apply to submitted samples; they do not establish the quality, identity or acceptance of every installed bar or the whole building.
- Held HSTU concrete test — component uncertain7 August 2025: three unsealed specimens; average crushing strength 32.49 MPa. The source names an academic-building first-floor roof.
7 August 2025 · The source building label differs from administrative building. Do not assign this test to WD-08 or certify all work. Sampling identity and laboratory authenticity need their own evidence.
Independent acceptance and the present condition are not established here. A dated resident observation appears in the conversation as a citizen account.
Scope & responsibility
A project account
Thakurgaon college components described by IMED: administrative-building evidence and a separately identified land-acquisition component. Procurement links remain contextual candidates. Land expenditure is not a payment against the building contract; whole-programme amounts remain in their own dossier.
- Implementing agency in report
- Directorate of Technical Education; works reviewed under Education Engineering Department
- Record
- thakurgaon-engineering-college · reviewed 6 October 2026
Location is recorded in the source; current conditions have not been independently inspected.
Original record title
Thakurgaon engineering college: building, time and inspection
Record details
Identifiers, procurement and bids
Planned quantities are separate from measured or accepted work.
Work, quantity and source details
- Evidence scope
- Thakurgaon college components described by IMED: administrative-building evidence and a separately identified land-acquisition component. Procurement links remain contextual candidates. Land expenditure is not a payment against the building contract; whole-programme amounts remain in their own dossier.
Differences & limits
2 points to check
These are questions to check. Missing records, money differences and reported completion do not establish corruption.
- The report’s table gives 20 June 2023–20 June 2026, while its inspection section prints 19 June 2026 under an actual-completion heading despite 50% progress and ongoing work. These are conflicting source claims; none is promoted as actual completion.
- The candidate e-GP award gives signing 9 November 2023, proposed start 12 December 2023 and proposed completion 27 October 2026. It also prints a different exact contract amount. Signed instruments and approved extensions are needed to resolve the report.
Missing documents
5 records · who holds them
Some answers are shown here, and some held documents still need further extraction or review. Other records need a request to the holding office. The labels distinguish these situations; missing online does not mean unobtainable.
Office holding all of these: EED Thakurgaon Executive Engineer/accounts; DTE project office; Deputy Commissioner land branch for acquisition
Approved scope and item prices
Partly answeredThe candidate tender notice records a BOQ Correction; its match to this IMED building still needs confirmation. The corrected file and accepted rates were not obtained.
See the evidence for this topic2 fields reviewed · 6 October 2026
What the sources establish
Evidence held- What we found
- The candidate tender notice records a BOQ Correction; its match to this IMED building still needs confirmation. The corrected file and accepted rates were not obtained.
Read the source date and scope with this finding. A retrieved summary is not the underlying signed account.
Approved scope and item prices
Ask the holding office- What we found
- Request the existing records from the responsible office. Ask it to confirm records not yet created or held elsewhere.
- Still needed
- Signed scope, specifications, drawings and priced BOQ: item, quantity, unit, accepted rate and total.
- Holding office
- EED Thakurgaon Executive Engineer/accounts; DTE project office; Deputy Commissioner land branch for acquisition
The named office is a collection route; custody, existence and disclosure of each missing file require confirmation. Missing records do not establish wrongdoing.
Start and approved changes
Partly answeredThe candidate award proposes completion on 27 October 2026. Programme extension to June 2028 does not itself extend this building contract.
See the evidence for this topic2 fields reviewed · 6 October 2026
What the sources establish
Evidence held- What we found
- The candidate award proposes completion on 27 October 2026. Programme extension to June 2028 does not itself extend this building contract.
Read the source date and scope with this finding. A retrieved summary is not the underlying signed account.
Start and approved changes
Ask the holding office- What we found
- Request the existing records from the responsible office. Ask it to confirm records not yet created or held elsewhere.
- Still needed
- Signed work order, possession/commencement record and approved time/cost/scope changes with dates and authority.
- Holding office
- EED Thakurgaon Executive Engineer/accounts; DTE project office; Deputy Commissioner land branch for acquisition
The named office is a collection route; custody, existence and disclosure of each missing file require confirmation. Missing records do not establish wrongdoing.
Measured work and acceptance
Partly answeredInspection findings and a 2024 steel test are held. The 2025 concrete test names the academic building, so it is not administrative-building acceptance.
See the evidence for this topic2 fields reviewed · 6 October 2026
What the sources establish
Evidence held- What we found
- Inspection findings and a 2024 steel test are held. The 2025 concrete test names the academic building, so it is not administrative-building acceptance.
Read the source date and scope with this finding. A retrieved summary is not the underlying signed account.
Measured work and acceptance
Ask the holding office- What we found
- Request the existing records from the responsible office. Ask it to confirm records not yet created or held elsewhere.
- Still needed
- Measurement-book pages, inspection/test reports, defect corrections and any signed acceptance/handover already issued.
- Holding office
- EED Thakurgaon Executive Engineer/accounts; DTE project office; Deputy Commissioner land branch for acquisition
The named office is a collection route; custody, existence and disclosure of each missing file require confirmation. Missing records do not establish wrongdoing.
Bills and deductions
Partly answeredThe report discusses running bills across four buildings, without a Thakurgaon bill split or signed certification sheets.
See the evidence for this topic2 fields reviewed · 6 October 2026
What the sources establish
Evidence held- What we found
- The report discusses running bills across four buildings, without a Thakurgaon bill split or signed certification sheets.
Read the source date and scope with this finding. A retrieved summary is not the underlying signed account.
Checked:Bills and deductions
Ask the holding office- What we found
- Request the existing records from the responsible office. Ask it to confirm records not yet created or held elsewhere.
- Still needed
- Bill register and each certified bill: measured quantities, gross/net amounts, tax, VAT, retention, advances and adjustments.
- Holding office
- EED Thakurgaon Executive Engineer/accounts; DTE project office; Deputy Commissioner land branch for acquisition
The named office is a collection route; custody, existence and disclosure of each missing file require confirmation. Missing records do not establish wrongdoing.
Checked:
Payments and account reconciliation
Ask the holding officeLand acquisition has a separate reported amount. Building payments and the district share of programme transactions remain unverified.
See the evidence for this topic2 fields reviewed · 6 October 2026
What the sources establish
Evidence held- What we found
- Land acquisition has a separate reported amount. Building payments and the district share of programme transactions remain unverified.
Read the source date and scope with this finding. A retrieved summary is not the underlying signed account.
Payments and account reconciliation
Ask the holding office- What we found
- Request the existing records from the responsible office. Ask it to confirm records not yet created or held elsewhere.
- Still needed
- Dated release receipts and bill-linked executed settlements, payee/reference, reversals, liabilities and reconciliation for a stated account and cutoff.
- Holding office
- EED Thakurgaon Executive Engineer/accounts; DTE project office; Deputy Commissioner land branch for acquisition
The named office is a collection route; custody, existence and disclosure of each missing file require confirmation. Missing records do not establish wrongdoing.
Related records
3 connections · exact and possible matches
Exact identifiers and possible matches remain distinct, and a programme total is not this work’s share.
Awarded contracts1 connections
Contract amounts belong to their own packages. They are not additional project spending.
Administrative-building award, tender 867690
Possible match · needs reviewcontract-325034
Candidate contextual identity: same ten-storey Thakurgaon engineering-college building, MSCL-PCL JV and W-08/WD-08 package variant. Report does not print tender 867690, and dates/value differ.
Programmes and other records2 connections
Read each connection’s basis and scope before comparing amounts.
Possible match · needs reviewprogramme-224261500
Contextual match of full title, implementing agency and named four districts; no printed code in this report.
Whole-programme expenditure account
Possible match · needs reviewengineering-colleges-programme
Separate whole-programme financial scope from same IMED report.
Keep a private follow-up
Your own notes on requests and replies
Original documents · open a page to check the claim
…